Federal judge lets Trump's $10 billion BBC defamation suit proceed

A Florida federal judge rejected the BBC's bid to dismiss Trump's $10 billion defamation suit over the documentary "Trump: A Second Chance?" while dropping one state-law claim.

Wire notes

  • Trump seeks $10 billion in damages from the BBC in a suit filed in December.
  • Judge Jeffrey Kuntz denied the BBC's dismissal motion on Tuesday but tossed an unfair-business-practices claim under Florida law.
  • A separate October ruling ordered Trump to sit for a deposition by December 11.
  • The case stems from the documentary "Trump: A Second Chance?" and its editing of Trump's January 6, 2021 speech.
  • The BBC apologized for splicing quotes, and its director general and top news executive resigned.
Judge allows Trump defamation case against BBC to proceed but tosses one claim
PhotoJudge allows Trump defamation case against BBC to proceed but tosses one claim — qimono / pixabay

President Donald Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC will proceed after a federal judge in Florida denied the broadcaster's motion to dismiss on Tuesday. Judge Jeffrey Kuntz ruled only on procedure, not on the merits of the case.

Kuntz trimmed the suit in one respect. He tossed Trump's claim that the BBC's conduct violated a Florida law covering unfair business practices. The defamation claim survives.

Trump filed the suit in December. He accused the publicly funded British broadcaster of defamation and of deceptive and unfair trade practices tied to the documentary "Trump: A Second Chance?"

What does the case hinge on?

The dispute centers on how the documentary edited Trump's speech to supporters on January 6, 2021, before the storming of the U.S. Capitol. The BBC has acknowledged that filmmakers spliced together quotes from different sections of that speech in a way that made it appear Trump was directly urging violence.

The broadcaster apologized for the editing. Judge Kuntz noted that apology in his ruling. The BBC's director general and its top news executive both resigned over the affair. The BBC nonetheless denies Trump's claim that it defamed him.

Why is the timing contentious?

Discovery has already forced Trump into the deposition chair. In October, a different Florida judge ordered Trump to sit for a deposition in the case by December 11, after BBC lawyers complained the president was delaying his appearance in his own lawsuit.

Charles Tobin, an attorney for the BBC, said in court that with two months left in the discovery period, "we still haven't been able to depose the plaintiff." The deposition deadline could still be extended.

How did Trump respond?

The president called Kuntz's ruling a major victory and framed it as a broader fight against the press.

"A Huge Victory against Fake News BBC, a terrible abuser of the truth, just handed down by highly respected District Court Judge, Jeffrey T. Kuntz, of the Southern District of Florida," Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday evening.

"We will continue fighting against, and defeating, all of those who try to deceive the American People!" he wrote.

For media lawyers and brand-side communicators, the ruling keeps alive one of the largest defamation damages demands ever leveled at a major broadcaster. The next pressure point is the deposition calendar: whether Trump testifies before the December 11 deadline, or the court extends it, will signal how quickly the case moves toward trial or settlement.

via latimes.com (Source)

Filed under

Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

Staff writer covering companies, deals and strategy in marketing, advertising, marketing technology, media, SEO and search at Marketing Herald.

310 articles

More on the wire

« Previous articleNext article »