Death Threats Hit Ex-Converse CMO Over Ad He Had Nothing to Do With
Threats flooded former Converse CMO Rodney Rambo's phone over a Karina ad he had no part in — he left the brand in January, months before the campaign.
Updated

The brief
- Former Converse CMO Rodney Rambo received death threats on a Friday morning over an ad he had nothing to do with.
- Rambo departed Converse in January, months before the ad featuring Kpop star Karina holding Chuck 70 X sneakers went viral.
- Some social media users said the ad's lighting recalled Ku Klux Klan imagery; one user wrote to Rambo on LinkedIn: "You should be disgusted that this ad was ever approved."
Threats flooded former Converse CMO Rodney Rambo's phone on a Friday morning — over an ad he had no part in approving.
Rambo had departed Converse in January, months before the brand released the campaign that featured Kpop star Karina wearing a white skirt and holding a pair of new Chuck 70 X sneakers. The ad went viral on social media, and some users said its lighting recalled Ku Klux Klan imagery.
Rambo had nothing to do with the widely-condemned ad. But he had seen it — the night before the threats began, on the day it spread across social platforms.
"You should be disgusted that this ad was ever approved," one user wrote to Rambo on LinkedIn, in one of multiple comments seen by ADWEEK.
The incident highlights a harsh reality for senior marketing executives: public anger over a brand's creative rarely checks the org chart before it lands. Rambo, who left his post at Converse before the campaign existed, became a target anyway — simply because his name remained attached to the role in the public mind.
The ad itself centered on Karina, one of Kpop's most prominent stars, promoting the Chuck 70 X sneaker. It was the lighting and styling choices that drew the backlash, with social media users drawing comparisons to KKK imagery. The condemnation was, by all accounts, widespread.
For Rambo, the personal toll was immediate and direct. The messages arrived on his phone on a Friday morning. They came through channels including LinkedIn, where users addressed him as if he had signed off on the creative — even though his tenure at the company had ended in January, well before the campaign ran.
The case is a cautionary one for CMOs and their communications teams. Departure announcements fade quickly; public memory of who held the top marketing seat does not. When a campaign ignites, the scrutiny follows the title, not the timeline — and executives who have long since moved on can find themselves absorbing the fallout.
It also raises questions about how brands handle crisis communication when the obvious target of public anger is no longer employed. Whether Converse clarifies the timeline of Rambo's departure — or lets the threats against a former executive stand unanswered — will shape how the industry reads this episode.
For marketers watching from other companies, the lesson is stark: in an era when ad backlash spreads within hours, the gap between holding a CMO title and wearing the consequences of one has effectively closed.
Based on Adweek
Filed under crisis-communication, brand-backlash, cmo, converse, social-media-backlash
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering media and advertising at Marketing Herald.
48 articles
More from the wire
- Converse Apologizes for Ads Critics Say Evoked Lynching Imagery
- Converse, Oxford United, Ed Sheeran: Inside Marketing's Apology Spiral
- Converse's Dual Ad Failures Expose Global Marketing Process Gaps
- Converse Ad Controversy Highlights Repeat Pattern of Racially Insensitive Brand Work
- "Doom Trolling" Warned as Credibility Risk for AI Industry PR