Channel 4 Axes Married At First Sight UK After Welfare Review

Channel 4 has axed Married At First Sight UK after 10 years, saying welfare-review fixes would 'fundamentally alter' a format that has 'run its course'.

Wire notes

  • Channel 4 has axed Married At First Sight UK after a 10-year run, following rape and sexual misconduct allegations from female participants.
  • An independent review led by former BBC One controller Lorraine Heggessey recommended CCTV, panic buttons and a 'safe word' system.
  • A second review by law firm Clyde & Co found no breach of Ofcom's broadcasting code.
  • The already-filmed series six and the spin-off Second Married At First Sight will both never air.
  • CEO Priya Dogra said the show's budget will be reinvested in 'distinctive new programming'.
MAFS UK: Hit Reality Show Axed Following Review Into Welfare
PhotoMAFS UK: Hit Reality Show Axed Following Review Into Welfare — JK_90 / pixabay

Channel 4 has cancelled Married At First Sight UK after two female participants made rape allegations and a third alleged a non-consensual act during production. The broadcaster confirmed the 10-year-old format will not return, despite an independent review concluding it could continue with enhanced welfare protocols.

A BBC Panorama investigation earlier this year brought the allegations to light. All the men involved denied the claims. Channel 4 swiftly pulled the show from streaming platforms and halted filming on both a sixth series and a spin-off while two reviews ran.

What did the reviews find?

The first review, overseen by former BBC One controller Lorraine Heggessey, examined welfare protocols. It found the existing protocols were of a high standard and judged it reasonable to continue making the show — with enhancements. It noted that 'intimacy is a key focus' and that 'some elements of the show could implicitly put pressure on contributors to be intimate.'

Its recommendations included:

  • CCTV installed in all areas of the participants' apartments, constantly monitored by a welfare team
  • Panic buttons for contributors
  • A 'safe word' system

A second review, led by law firm Clyde & Co, examined the welfare protocols in place at the time of the allegations. It found 'isolated incidents where the welfare framework was not fully implemented' but made no findings of a breach of Ofcom's broadcasting code.

By the reviews' own account, the show was safe to continue. Channel 4 chose otherwise.

Why did Channel 4 cancel a show deemed safe?

Chief Executive Priya Dogra said implementing every recommendation would demand a level of intervention, monitoring and supervision that would fundamentally alter the show's format and concept.

Confirming the axe, Dogra said: 'Whilst the review praised the welfare protocols in place and made no findings that Channel 4 breached the Ofcom code or that the format is inherently unsafe, I have to consider when is the right time for Channel 4 to move on from a format.'

She continued: 'The recommendations are eminently sensible and feasible, but considering their wholesale implementation provoked fundamental questions about the editorial proposition of a show that, I believe, has now run its course over 10 years.'

What happens to the shelved series?

Series six was in production when the review was commissioned. Channel 4 confirmed it will never be broadcast because it was not made under the recommended new protocols. The spin-off, Second Married At First Sight, previously in pre-production, is also cancelled. Dogra said she was 'very sorry for the distress those women have clearly felt' and confirmed the show's budget will be reinvested in 'distinctive new programming.'

Dame Caroline Dinenage MP, chair of the House of Commons culture and media committee, said the decision to axe the show 'makes sense.' Addressing the 'seriousness of the allegations,' she said: 'Reality TV contestants have often been treated as a commodity, with duty of care a slogan rather than a genuine principle. Everyone involved in producing and regulating reality TV must now learn and act.'

For the wider unscripted sector, the precedent is stark: a format can survive scandal but not the compliance cost of fixing it.

via graziadaily.co.uk (Source)

Filed under

Share this article:

More from Tom Whitfield

Tom Whitfield

Show full bio

Staff writer covering companies, deals and strategy in marketing, advertising, marketing technology, media, SEO and search at Marketing Herald.

250 articles

More on the wire

« Previous article